Post Audience Feedback

There are 3 main way we recieved feed back for are 3 media text.

Private viewing
two days before we completed the work, myself and another member of my team invited one person each to come and give some positive cristism before we submitted the work. The viewing happened in the media suite and we showed all 3 media pieces.

Are feed back was...

Georgina kleatheous 19
'the title needs to be a bit clearer, i had to squint to see it'
'the music cut off a bit to early at the end of the trailer'
'the posters really detailed so you need to add a lot the the magazine cover'





    Marianne Hakeem 18
    'Add something more to text in the trailer, it looks a bit boring in comparison to
     your other shots'
    ' Sort the volume of the music out, it tends to dip throughout the trailer'








Screening

We explained and showed are work to 30+ viewer of a mixed age range to get their feed back, we produced an invitation and a questionnaire as a quick and simple way to gain feed back

gv

From this feed back it is clear that the combination between all 3 products is clear and consistent as all respondents said that they either agree or strongly agree, this is important as these media products are a promotional tool and therefor have to be recognizable. As it is a promotional tool the response the question referring to whether the trailer makes you want to watch the film is also important, the majority people said yes it did, however 11% said they were unsure, many said this was because they found the trailer a bit confusing.

Some other responses

1. "I would give away more in the trailer- to draw the people in."
2. " did not like the music"
3. "everything was well presented and displayed"
4. "emphasise darkness e.g. its something scary so use darker colours to emphasise evil/infection."
5. "well made trailer

Youtube

We uploaded are trailer on to youtube and recieved feed back from a feature film producer and directer called Mike Roll.